isn’t cool enough for the in-crowd. Screw that. If 1/10 of the current crop of naysayers could write 1/10 the number of poems with 1/10 the skill and power that Cummings boasted it would be a revolutionary and positive change in the poetry scene today. Dumping on your predecessors does nothing to make you better.
-
Archives
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
- July 2006
- June 2006
- May 2006
- April 2006
- March 2006
- February 2006
- January 2006
- December 2005
- November 2005
- October 2005
- August 2005
- July 2005
- June 2005
- May 2005
- April 2005
- March 2005
- February 2005
- January 2005
- December 2004
- November 2004
- October 2004
- September 2004
- August 2004
- July 2004
-
Meta
Odd – though I don’t know to exactly what post you’re referring, haven’t made the blog rounds yet – b/c every 18-yr-old I’ve known since my own graduation came out of hs loving Cummings. I was recently working with two freshly-minted undergrads who think he’s the shit. Maybe this sort of popularity causes folks to look at him rough?
o/t: Chris, do you have any thoughts (in Ruminate) on server vs. desktop aggregators? Tried the search but couldn’t find anything. Cheers – Jason
I also don’t know who’s dissing cummings, I like him too, and think he probably is ‘important,’ in that he had a good feel for spontaneous oral pacing before such things became popular. & vernacular. & the visual effect a poem can make on the page.
We all loved cummings at age 14, or 18, or whenever. We all outgrew his sentimentality, the endless springtimes and the condemnation of those despise springtime, the simplistic black-and-white ideology. It’s a very adolescent sensibility! (I’m sure George Bush loves springtime too.) It’s very true that Cummings also had immense talent that few can match, so I agree with the thrust of your post. I just think you also have to look at the reasons why people reject Cummings: it takes a bit of maturity to recover from the jaded undergraduate condemnation of Cummings, the embarrassment at having fallen for some of the worst aspects of his poetry along with the best. I would say there is something wrong with someone who doesn’t despise Cummings by age 20 or so. Someone who still hates it at 30, on the other hand, is still overcompensating.
Also, it should be noted that his reputation never quite recovered from that devastating RP Blackmur essay back in the 1930s. Although Blackmur was quite harsh, he did score some points that are quite hard to deny. Thus Cummings was never the influential figure that Williams was, for example, in the 1950s and 1960s.
Spot-on Jonathan, I am railing against people who are old enough to know better. It’s one thing to get out of high school and realize that cummings is sentimental and it is much cooler to be jaded. It’s another thing to be (presumably) an adult an adopt the same world-weary attitude.
Not only that, but what’s wrong with some sentimentality and exuberance if one has the ability to back it up? I just posted about the young Louis Armstrong– should we write him off in our personal quest to become avant garde jazz sophisticates that can brook no one other than Lester Bowie or Don Cherry?
It’s not only immense presumption on one’s part to assume that because I posted about Armstrong I must not understand (or like, or appreciate) Bowie, but it’s downright sad to not be able to enjoy that pioneering work.
I’m not talking about *you* (Jonathan) in that last comment, I hope it’s clear! Just making an analogy.
I didn’t take it that way. I love Armstrong too, along with Clifford Brown and Don Cherry. And I wish I still had that collected poems of Cummings.
“We all loved cummings at age 14, or 18, or whenever. We all outgrew his sentimentality, the endless springtimes and the condemnation of those despise springtime, the simplistic black-and-white ideology. It’s a very adolescent sensibility! (I’m sure George Bush loves springtime too.)”
Jonathan, how did George Bush get into this statement? When did ‘spring’ become an equivalent to right wing, fascist ideology? We are to despise ‘spring’? We are to outgrow ‘spring’?
I suppose there is the parodic ditty ‘it’s springtime for hitler in Germany’, is that where your thinking, ahem, ‘springs’ from?
There was once a reason to condemn certain ideas and subjects as kitsch, but those reasons are becoming a little fishy. Those reasons are turning into a fascism of their own.
“I would say there is something wrong with someone who doesn’t despise Cummings by age 20 or so.”
There won’t be any real poetry written by jaded adults, in fact, I don’t even think you’re one.
No, I didn’t mean that there was anything wrong with liking spring, but that this was an unreliable barometer of anything else. Even evil people like spring, so when Cummings condemns the enemies of spring and flowers and innocence, etc… just who does he have in mind? Poetry can come from jaded adults as easily as from sentimental children.
Gee Jonathan, I think you can use your imagination on this one. When did you become such a literalist?
Children are rarely-if ever-sentimental.